Posts filed under ‘e2publish’

Online publishing

It’s been a while since I’ve had free time to make any progress with my pet project.  e2publish is an AIR application for creating online magazines.  I’ve written it for amateur enthusiasts.  Not professional writers or publishing houses.  Although I think that old-school publishing establishments need to be aware that technology is going to change EVERYTHING.  Especially in terms of the contribution and “fan” content that will be created and manipulated by the consumers.  In the old days, magazines may as well have been carved in stone, as there was no way for the reader to interact with it (apart from a few “letters to the editor”).  So I see the role of publishing houses as changing (at least the role of those that survive the shake-up).  As they develop technological solutions to nurture and harness creative and dynamic “fan” participation.

Just as web 2.0 applications enable anyone to “write” to the internet, rather than passively just consume and read its content.  The vision of e2publish was to allow people to make their own electronic magazines.

Users can network and collaborate with each other, and share draft articles to their members of their team.  It has a powerful editor with capabilities for styling and arranging text and pictures, powerful text-wrapping, and stylising the look of pages.  Once published, the magazines can be accessed and read using the “reader” application, e2world.

In fact this project is so “all-encompassing” that I was a fool to embark on it in my own time, with no funding.  And now that I’m getting close to a prototype that gets close to part of my vision, I’m really not sure how to popularise it or commercialise it.  Any suggestions welcome.  But first of all, I’m looking for beta-testers who can help me put this prototype through its paces, and help me to improve the experience.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

I’m going to describe the publication process in detail.  (This time, I’m not going to talk about the powerful TLF-based document editing part, because I’ve done quite enough of that in previous blog posts.)

The AIR applications can be downloaded from

If you haven’t been following this project, you’ll find the e2publish tutorial videos helpful.  Just click on the HELP drop-down menu.

In e2publish, if you click on the first icon in the toolbar “e:”, this will take you to the author discussion pages.  There are many categories to choose from, and this will be the place where enthusiasts might network, and recruit like-minded enthusiasts to collaborate on a magazine together.

The team would appoint an “editor”.  This is the person with a few more options and capabilities at their disposal that other team members don’t have.  The editor can create a magazine (Publish->Settings…) then click on the big “new magazine” button (you can’t miss it).

After completing the form, nothing is published or visible to the “readers” at this stage.  All we’ve done is created a group, and the editor can bring in new users to join this group.  (editor options…->invite user).

Members of the group can discuss or share e2publish documents amongst themselves.  There’s a “Magazine article pool” in which you can collect articles that you intend to appear in the next issue.

Finally, when you’ve written all the articles, you can publish the next issue of the magazine.  (A magazine can have many issues, maybe monthly, or quarterly, etc.).  (editor options…->publish magazine).

The publish form allows you to sort the articles into the order you wish them to appear.  Or decide which ones not to include.  You can write a description and upload a thumbnail to represent the issue.

Finally, you click “publish now” when you’re confident that you wish to go public with your magazine.

Now your magazine is public, and it can be viewed in e2world.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

e2world is the first prototype of the “reader” application.  It’s not perfect, it’s not refined, it’s not optimised.  (The application could easily be a fraction of its current file size).

But I’ve used this prototype to play around with some user interface ideas, like the page curl effect when you turn a page, and the variation on a radial menu when you click on a page.  Let me know what you think about these.

When you first start e2world, it displays all of the currently available magazine articles.  I haven’t yet wired up a voting scheme (how many stars do you award a magazine), or the ability to subscribe.  That will come later.

Click on a magazine description to download it.  Viewing a magazine, you just click to bring up the “radial menu”.  The menu allows you to navigate between articles, pages, back to the list of magazines (home), or a chat page for users to discuss the current article that you’re reading.

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

You can download the prototype applications from

Please, please, let me know what you think.  Any bug reports or suggestions, let me know.  If anyone would like to become an official beta-tester just leave a message.

July 18, 2010 at 6:42 pm Leave a comment

Thoughts about Open, Closed, and Hypocrisy

The following thoughts are my response to John Mason’s recent post Is Mike Chambers a hypocrite?Well, It’s not really a direct response to John’s arguments.  I enjoyed reading what he wrote, as it is nice to see unbiassed and fresh opinions out there.  There are too many fan boys with an axe to grind.  John’s post got me thinking about some issues.  So it was my catalyst for the following stream of loosely related consciousness:-

For years, Flash was the only serious choice for rich media experience on the internet.  The success of Flash can be attributed to innovation.

I’ve never seen open-development innovate and popularise anything really new and different.  This is why I prefer closed, proprietary, patented, and commercially driven technologies.  I’m no tree-hugging free and open idealist.  I’ve never seen the open approach plant the seed of innovation.  The open approach is only successful when the paradigm had already been defined by (closed architecture) commercially driven innovation pushing the envelope and creating the future.

But if Adobe had innovated faster – there would be more to distinguish Flash from the alternatives now.  I’ve also felt held-back waiting years for features in AIR or the flash player.  Perhaps they were resting on their laurels.  The survival of Flash could depend on more aggressive innovation from Adobe in the years to come.  I think a revision of their culture, vision, and technical leadership could be on the cards.

For Adobe, the shortest distance between two points isn’t a straight line.  It’s not a path ascending the pinnacle of engineering elegance and excellence.

This is something about Adobe’s commercial approach that I DON’T like.

More often than not, their path is dictated by the maximum incentive to pay to upgrade to the next version.  So we took some detours and got stuck in some cul-de-sacs. ActionScript-2.  The Bloated Flex Halo Framework.  The Advanced Data Grid.

The poor performance of the Flash player on the Mac platform hasn’t won Adobe many Mac allies in the current conflict.  (I’m not talking specifically about Video performance – let’s not hear the excuses).  To be truly ubiquitous – the performance has to be comparable across all platforms – otherwise you need to engineer your application to the slowest platform, wasting any speed advantages on the faster platform.

What I consider hypocritical about Adobe’s claims to openness is that Flash platform development is not a level playing field.

It appears to be dominated by a clique of best buddies in San Francisco.  I’ve been involved in Flash platform programming for a decade.  A pioneer of RIAs.  Yet always outside the inner sanctum.

My biggest gripe about Adobe’s openness is that Adobe builds applications that compete with the developers who buy their products.  It’s a peculiar relationship that Adobe has with its customers.  On the one hand, we buy their tools, on the other hand, we compete with their developers and their applications.

While it’s unlikely that Adobe will reject your AIR application from the marketplace – but you may find yourself in a situation where you put a lot of time into a project, only to get into a situation where Adobe will throw a lot of money, development effort, and publicity into a competing product.

I found myself in this predicament with e2publish.  When I first started developing e2publish, Adobe announced their alliance and funding, (and later acquisition) of the BuzzWord project.

Maybe I’m biassed, but I always thought that e2publish, with its clever text wrapping and potential for publishing to be a much more interesting project than BuzzWord.  Certainly more ambitious.  Just think about what I could have achieved with BuzzWord’s development budget.  Nevertheless, I didn’t like the odds of going up against Goliath – so I abandoned e2publish for a couple of years.  It’s still an unfunded prototype with a lot of potential.

April 29, 2010 at 8:56 pm Leave a comment

e2publish video tutorials

e2publish is an AIR application that utilises the Text Layout Framework (TLF) and Squiggly spell checking.  It has two powerful text wrapping modes, and plenty of features to customise the look of document pages.

The following video tutorials provide an overview of the most important features.

Introduction: Pictures and text…

Advanced text wrapping…

Layouts: Customising page appearance…

Tables and top text shutter…

Sharing documents online…

About import:-

1. e2publish can import e2spreadsheet graphs, or e2vector illustrations.  You can import from your computer’s filesystem, or shared documents online.

2. Because it can import from e2vector, you can import illustrations that originated in Flash.  Export them as .fxg files, import then into e2vector, then import the .e2v file into e2publish.

3. Make sure you have the latest versions of e2spreadsheet, e2vector and e2publish.

. . . . . . . . . .

These applications are beta versions.  Please let me know about any bugs or feature requests.  (You can leave your comments here).

April 28, 2010 at 3:37 pm 1 comment

e2publish now with tables, advanced text wrapping, and new look

The latest update to e2publish is available from my website here.

It has several enhancements over the previous version.  A new user interface.  I’ve incorporated my advanced text wrapping feature.  You can choose either fast or advanced text wrapping by clicking the new icons at the bottom-left corner of the page template menu.

This new version has tables, which an be styled in the same way as text boxes.

New picture options enable a picture to be displayed with a frame, rounded corners, elliptical mask, or custom shape – for text-wrapping around irregular shaped pictures.

There’s an “edit” button that allows the user to crop a picture, or define the custom text-wrapping border, by simply drawing around the picture.

Download it now from my website!.  And please, please leave your comments and bug reports.

March 5, 2010 at 12:18 pm Leave a comment

Wrapping text around a giraffe

It’s 2:00am Monday morning.  I’ve just spent all weekend obsessively wrapping text around giraffes.

If you’ve been following my blog, you may remember that a few weeks ago I was blown away by Apple’s presentation of the new iPad.  Particularly iWork and “Pages”.  Having watched a demonstration of text wrapping around a picture of a giraffe – I only wished that I had time to implement this kind of text wrapping in my e2publish AIR application.

Then another developer left a comment on this blog, that he and his team had done this in an application they’d made.

Not wishing to be outdone – I locked myself away this weekend, deprived myself of some sleep, and implemented a much more powerful text wrapping algorithm for e2publish.

It’s more computationally intensive than the previous way I did things.  It takes longer to refresh a page.  But the old (fast but less versatile) scheme comes into play when it can.

You won’t be able to play around with the fruits of my weekend labours yet.  I have other significant enhancements to make to e2publish before I release a new version with the ability to wrap text around giraffes (or other oddly-shaped pictures).  But you can still download the current version here.

February 21, 2010 at 4:02 pm 3 comments

Further thoughts about the iPad, Flash, and what Jobs said.

They are lazy, Jobs says. They have all this potential to do interesting things but they just refuse to do it. They don’t do anything with the approaches that Apple is taking, like Carbon. Apple does not support Flash because it is so buggy, he says. Whenever a Mac crashes more often than not it’s because of Flash. No one will be using Flash, he says. The world is moving to HTML5.” (quote extracted from here).

I’ve always had a lot of respect for Steve Jobs.   If Jobs says something – I listen.  And so does the entire computing industry.

If Steve Jobs were to say something that challenged my world view – I wouldn’t get defensive or upset.  I would listen very carefully to the message.

I’ve said this before: I’m not a fan boy.  I think evangelism is unhealthy.  But I have tremendous loyalty to the Apple brand based on technical merit.

My other foot is firmly planted in the Adobe camp.  I’ve been dedicated and involved in the Flash Platform for the last ten years because I was excited by its ubiquitous nature, its consumer saturation, and its potential for mobile deployment.  ActionScript 3 is a joy.  Most of my waking hours are spent using Flex commercially or coding sophisticated Pure ActionScript.  (resolution 2010 – I really must get out more).

There are three parts to Steve’s message.

I fully agree with the first part of Jobs’ statement.  Think of it as a wake-up call.

I’m not going to talk about “Flash is buggy” accusation .  I think Flash on a Mac is better than it used to be.  There’s a lot of speculation elsewhere about this issue. I won’t add to the noise.

I don’t agree with the last part of Steve’s message.  I’ve heard all about the demise of Flash before.  I’ve seen Flash-killers come and go and fade into obscurity.  Flash has a strong legacy and following and I don’t see it disappearing.

Mac users have often been treated as second-class citizens by Macromedia/Adobe.  Initial releases of software such as Flex and ColdFusion were released for PC only.  I remember having to wait ages before I was able to obtain the first pre-release version of Flex that I could run on my Mac.

Yet, back in the pioneering days – I noticed something about the people who were getting most excited about using Flash to write applications.  Most were Mac users like myself.

The performance of Flash on the Mac has been an issue for all the time I’ve been using Flash.  It IS implementation laziness.  Every software development project I’ve worked on (both commercial and personal) has involved an optimisation phase to make things to run faster.  I do this a lot in Flex and ActionScript.  To improve the user experience on a PC as well as Mac.  Working on my code to compensate for the feeble Flash runtime, or Flex framework.  I wish Macromedia/Adobe had done more optimisation at their end, as it would have saved me a lot of work at my end.

I’ve heard the excuses.  That this is a consequence of executing something in a ubiquitous runtime rather than natively.  That Flash or Flex provide a higher-level authoring experience (compared to Pure ActionScript), so I must accept the consequences .  I don’t accept these excuses.

Flash was probably fast enough for “conventional” uses.  Banner animations, web-sites, e-commerce, simple stuff dragged together in Flex.  But now people are writing applications that resemble the kinds of applications that run on your desktop.  The bar has been raised.  Users expect capabilities more like they get on the desktop, and developers like myself want to be empowered by Flash more than we are currently.

As a developer, my intimacy and familiarity with the ActionScript classes provide me with a unique vision of what the platform is capable of, and what is lacking.  TLF textflows for example.  In 2003, I described this idea (except my name for them was “linked text boxes”).  For many years I was frustrated by the limitations of the TextField object and the lack of control over text on the screen, until eventually we got the flash.text.engine class.

I could mention numerous other examples of enhancements and capabilities that we waited too long to happen – but at least we got there in the end.  The shortest distance between two points is a straight line.  What was the point of ActionScript 2? – superseded so quickly.  Or a bloated, slow, and badly conceived Halo Flex framework?  Every time that Adobe flounders – they weaken their competitive stance.  And that’s a pity – because I’m really on their side when they’re on-track.

I only wish that a little of Apple’s culture, attention to detail, boldness and vision could be injected into Adobe.

To develop AIR (or even browser) applications with Carbon-like capabilities would be incredible.  It’s an almost incomprehensible vision, compared to what’s possible currently – we’re still dragging our knuckles along the ground.

But if Flash is still dragging it’s knuckles along the ground, then conventional web technology “standards” (canvas, javascript, etc.) have hardly evolved from single cell organisms.  JavaScript!??  Don’t make me laugh.  While I admire the tenacity of developers who’ve created powerful applications in JavaScript (particularly Google’s applications) – I’ll stick to the powerful real language capabilities of ActionScript 3, along with the powerful libraries and complimentary technologies that Adobe have released over the last few years.  (Derrick Grigg has cited some examples of what AS3 can do that JavaScript can’t)  I’m not even sure that an application like e2publish, with its control over text formatting, is even possible in JavaScript.

So despite my frustrations as a developer about the limitations of Flash – it’s still better than the web standard alternatives.  In fact, Adobe shouldn’t even be competing with these lesser technologies.  They’re unworthy adversaries.  Be like the Samurai.

Instead, I wish that Adobe could raise its sights to see the potential of Flash in a similar way to how Steve Jobs sees the potential of Flash.

Unfortunately, Adobe sees the world very differently to Google or Apple.  I notice this every time that Adobe runs a competition, derby, funding scheme or incentive to support developers.  It’s always too much about image and eye-candy and not enough about functionality.  Sometimes, Adobe throws its support and money into a mediocre idea, and biasses the playing-field against much more ambitious visions.

Adobe is an eye-candy company.  Apple is much more about functionality – yet they always present it beautifully.  That’s an important difference.

I wrote something else here.  But I deleted it.  What I had to say would have seemed too much like Kanye West (Gay Fish) at an awards ceremony.  My comments may have upset another developer – and I didn’t want to do that.  Suffice to say that Adobe have often supported ideas or developers that demonstrated very little merit beyond an initial and very superficial “wow” factor.

It’s no wonder that the “web standard” fan boys think they have a shot at the title.  The real capabilities of the Flash Platform are Adobe’s most closely guarded secret.

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

On a related issue:  I mentioned how the RIA bar has been raised.  As developers, we’re increasingly aiming for a user experience that resembles the slickness of applications that run on the desktop, rather than the primitive tables, buttons and forms of a traditional web application.

I watched the iPad keynote presentation.  I was so blown away (uh oh, I’m starting to sound like Steve Jobs now) by the iWork demonstration that it almost made me weep.  Not because it was impressive.  Indeed it’s very impressive.  But it’s so impressive that it raises user expectations.  Our Flash based applications will be expected to compete with this level of experience.  That’s daunting – almost defeating.

The part of the video where the text wraps around the giraffes head was particularly daunting for me.  Actually, I know how to do this.  I know exactly how I’d implement that in ActionScript.  I’d love to bring that feature to e2publish.  But that would take time, and divert me from my commercial Flex work that I get paid for.  So that feature probably won’t make it for a while.

While I have lofty ambitions about pushing the envelope of what can be achieved with the Flash Platform – the downside is that I don’t really have the time to realise my vision.

(I tried to embed a link to the youtube video.  It didn’t work, probably because it’s the beta test HTML5 youtube service.  Try part 3 of 4 here.)

February 1, 2010 at 8:50 am 5 comments

Beta testers needed!

I need beta testers to use my e2publish AIR application.  Can anyone spare some time, or help me spread the word through their blogs and twitter?  It’s a very sophisticated project, and as well as bug reports – It could benefit from any suggestions, feedback and discussion.

Recap: I develop these applications in my own time, when I’m not working on commercial Flex projects.  e2publish is an ambitious project to allow users to collaborate and create snazzy magazine-style electronic-publications.  Later, I will also introduce features to enable the creation of much more interactive content.  (hotpots, animations, slide-shows, etc.).

Here is an example of the kinds of pages you can create in the current version.  (download/update now!)

e2publish is pure actionscript, and utilises Adobe’s Text Layout Framework, and Squiggly spell-check technologies.

Also in the works, I have a “viewing” application called e2network, which will allow users to browse, subscribe to, and read e2publish magazines.  It is my intention to create versions of e2network for the desktop, iPod, and iPad.  I see electronic magazines of this kind to be a killer-application for tablet devices.

e2publish can import graphs or illustrations from my other AIR applications: e2spreadsheet and e2vector.  I would also appreciate any user feedback about these applications too.

So, please please help me test this and get through to version 1.0 (currently version 0.253).  Here is a suggested testing plan.  You don’t have to stick to this though – just a guideline…


Please report:-

1. Bugs.  (Tell me exactly what steps to perform in order to reproduce the problem).

2. Difficulties.  (Anything that is difficult to understand or operate).

3. Suggestions as to how the application can be improved.  New features, etc.


Install e2publish, e2spreadsheet and e2vector.

Create a document with more than one page of text.

Highlight portions of text (using the highlighter).

Change the background colour of each page.

Apply one, two, or three column formats to pages.

Import pictures into your document.

Import graphs and drawings into your document.  (Created using e2spreadsheet and e2vector)

Click on pictures/graphs/drawings to select them.  Change their placement, frame, shadow, and colour, etc. using the PICTURE palette.  (left pop-out palettes).

Apply other changes using left pop-out palettes.

Apply Cut, Copy, Paste, Undo and Redo to the actions above.

Save, Save As… and Open documents.  (Use the File menu, or click on saved document icons, or drag documents onto application icon.)


Modify a page layout.  Click on the arrow icon (between the “e:” and “A” icons).  On this screen, you can:-

Resize and move linked text boxes.

Create new linked text boxes.

Create and position text boxes (stand alone- not linked).

Create and position pull-quotes.

Delete Text Boxes.

Change the appearance of a text box.  Colour, gradient, style, etc.
– using text box drop-down menu.

Add page layouts to favourites
– Use the + symbol within the templates drop-down menu.
– Apply a favourite layout to a particular page.

Apply Cut, Copy, Paste, Undo and Redo to the actions above.


Click on the “e:” symbol and create a new account.


Browse projects and shared files.

Open shared e2publish documents.

Import shared e2spreadsheet graphs and e2vector drawings into your e2publish document.

Share your own documents.  Online->Share this Document

…Thank you for your valuable contribution.

January 29, 2010 at 2:01 pm 7 comments

Some thoughts about the iPad, and stuff.

People are often surprised that I’m not interested in gadgets or electronic novelties.

Having made a significant technical contribution to the GSM standard, and my pioneering involvement in mobile telephony – Yet I waited a decade before I owned a mobile phone.  My phone is simple and fit-for-purpose.  It makes calls and sends messages.

I spent my teens writing computer games (for the primitive computers of the time) – yet I’m not interested in gaming.

I first turned my attention to the Flash Platform a long time before it appeared on the software professional’s radar. I was writing sophisticated applications before Flex, and before Adobe invented the acronym “RIA”.  I used to get flamed by irate graphic designers.  Disturbed that I was subverting their pretty pretty eye-candy technology for ugly and functional purposes.

I’m not interested in Flash widgets, gimmicks, mash-ups, or style without substance.

(I’m going to say something about the iPad soon – I just want to establish where I’m coming from).

I’m not a fan boy either.  My allegiance with Apple or Adobe are based on merit, not loyalty.  I like Apple computers.  But I’m not compelled to buy every Apple white-plastic or aluminium-clad novelty.

The iPad doesn’t run Flash in the browser.  That’s a disappointment.

I have to admit that I’m impressed and surprised by what can be achieved using Ajax.  Particularly the bold way in which Google pushes the envelope.  Who’d have thought that such things could be done in JavaScript?

Of course, ActionScript 3 is much more powerful.  Flash developers like myself were writing spreadsheets, text editors, and consumer-oriented applications in Flash 5! – Unfunded Flash enthusiasts were ahead of the curve.  Not that you’d know this.  Google have done a much better job of nurturing and showcasing the potential of “standards” than Adobe has achieved with the Flash Platform.  Adobe is an eye-candy company.  Google is much more focussed on functionality.

So if the iPad’s lack of Flash support undermines the market significance of the Flash Platform – Adobe only have themselves to blame.

No Flash in the iPad browser – but the iPad WILL run Flash-authored applications!  If they run on iPhone they’ll run on iPad.  I just need to cater for the 768×1024 screen size.

I’m likely to buy an iPad.  Not because of what it does, or the novelty.  But I’m interested in the potential of what it could be made to do.  I’m excited by a completely new class of application that could be created for a device like this. It’s great that I’ll be able to author things in pure ActionScript and utilise all my legacy pure actionscript classes.

Flash is capable of so much more than simple eye-candy widgets.  But that was a little difficult to convey on a 480×320 iPod-touch or iPhone screen.  I’m excited to see what other Flash/ActionScript developers do with the iPad.  (Contact me maybe? – we can discuss our ideas.)

I’ll be starting with a e2publish.  While everyone gets caught up in the excitement of Apple’s reality distortion field, you’ve gotta ask yourself “What’s the killer application for an iPad?”.  I think a big niche use is electronic magazines.  And I’ve been saying for a while that e2publish is intended for tablet devices.

An iPad user may be deprived a rich Flash experience within the browser – but I intend shared e2publish documents/magazines to convey a rich and interactive Flash-based experience.

I’ve noticed that iPad applications employ a user interface that flip like the pages of a magazine.  This is something I was always planning in the e2publish reader application.  But people are going to think I ripped this idea off now.

I’m a little concerned that the iPad is aluminium clad.  My MacBook is developing metal fatigue on one of the wrist rests.  A small patch of tiny dark indentations in the metal.  I showed this to an Apple Reseller a few days ago – No offers to replacement it.   The iPad will be handled much more than a MacBook – let’s hope that Apple tested their materials properly this time.

January 28, 2010 at 3:49 am 1 comment

Share e2 documents online

There are updates to all three e2 AIR applications available from my web site.




The updates allow you to share documents online.  Or to import shared documents into e2publish documents.  To use these capabilities, you need to register for an online account (free of course):-

This is still a beta test programme, and I’d love more feedback about this project.  I’m hoping that the ability to share documents will stimulate more interest.

To upload a document, simply select a project, and then select (click on) a file within that project:-

Notice the three application icons in the e2publish file sharing window.

Click on them to filter online files by file type.  e2publish can upload/import all three kinds of document.

To upload your own document, simply select the Online->Share this Document option in the drop-down menus.

At the moment, the filesystem is simple.  Each user has a public area, accessible to everyone else.  Actually, I’ve written a much more powerful filing system with groups, privileges, etc – but for now, I’m just using the basics.

I’ve also made some improvements to the e2publish user interface.

There’s a new “text box” drop down menu allowing to to alter the colour, gradient and style of a text box.

And there are new buttons in layout mode to insert or alter text boxes:-

January 12, 2010 at 12:30 pm Leave a comment

Import illustrations and graphs into e2publish

With the latest beta version of e2publish, users can import illustrations or graphs (e2vector or e2spreadsheet) into their document.  There are updated versions of all three applications from my website.  I’ve also got around to implementing native windows for Windows PC users (and presumably Linux users? … Can a Linux user verify that everything works ok?)

To import .e2s or .e2v content, simply press the picture import icon, but instead of choosing a .jpg or .png image, choose a file saved from one of my other AIR applications.

A spreadsheet may have more than one graph – so just click on the one you want:-

The cartoons shown are actually imported from Flash, via the import (.fxg) feature.  So it’s possible to include illustrations in e2publish that originated in flash, or from the Creative Commons (.svg) library via e2vector’s search feature.

One more feature worthy of a mention is the ability to save favourite page layouts.  In the “template” drop-down menu, notice that there’s a plus symbol in the bottom right corner.  Select it to save the current page layout as a favourite.  To remove a layout from the favourites click on the (X) symbol.

Please, please leave me your comments and suggestions.  These are very sophisticated AIR applications, so I need plenty of testing and feedback before I’m happy with releasing a version 1.0.

The next beta releases will incorporate the ability to collaborate, share and browse an online filesystem of documents.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Update: There seems to be a problem on a Windows PC (and presumably Linux too) – with opening a saved document by clicking on the file icon.  But opening a file from within the application is ok.

On a Mac – everything is fine.

January 3, 2010 at 12:16 pm Leave a comment

Older Posts

  RSS feed          View Daniel Freeman's LinkedIn profileView my profile

Add to Technorati Favorites

Top Posts

August 2014
« Apr    


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.